Bulgarian vs Okinawan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Okinawan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Okinawans
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Okinawan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,529,625 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,373,565 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 0.030%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Okinawan |
| Minimum | 5.0% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 39.6% |
| Range | 95.0% | 38.0% |
| Mean | 22.4% | 17.9% |
| Median | 18.0% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.8% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.7% | 21.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.6% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.5% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Okinawans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |