Brazilian vs Samoan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Samoan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Samoans
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Samoan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,153,944 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,914,322 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 0.080%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Samoan |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 20.6% | 29.9% |
| Range | 19.8% | 29.4% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 8.8% |
| Median | 7.9% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Samoans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.74%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |