Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Brazilian
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Brazilians
Immigrants from Ethiopia
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
80.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
62.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,153,944 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Brazilians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,298,755 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219 and weighted average of 8.9%, a difference of 3.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Brazilian | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 0.78% |
| Maximum | 20.6% | 22.7% |
| Range | 19.8% | 22.0% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 8.9% |
| Median | 7.9% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.7% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Brazilians and Immigrants from Ethiopia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Brazilians are Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (8.7%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Chile (8.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |