Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Samoan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Samoan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Samoans
8.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
62.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
79.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Samoan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,298,755 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219 and weighted average of 8.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,914,322 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 2.9%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Samoan |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 22.7% | 29.9% |
| Range | 22.0% | 29.4% |
| Mean | 8.9% | 8.8% |
| Median | 8.0% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia and Samoans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Israeli (8.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Afghan (8.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Guamanian/Chamorro (8.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Celtic (8.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Chile (8.9%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Spain (8.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (8.7%, a difference of 0.86%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |
| Celtics | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 8.8% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 8.8% |
| Afghans | 63.5 /100 | #166 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #167 | Good 8.9% |
| Israelis | 62.1 /100 | #168 | Good 8.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 59.6 /100 | #169 | Average 8.9% |