Immigrants from Norway vs Puget Sound Salish Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
 Puget Sound Salish
 Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Puget Sound Salish
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Puget Sound Salish Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,674,936 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,146,424 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195 and weighted average of 12.7%, a difference of 0.67%.
 
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Puget Sound Salish | 
| Minimum | 0.68% | 3.6% | 
| Maximum | 41.6% | 26.7% | 
| Range | 40.9% | 23.1% | 
| Mean | 10.8% | 13.0% | 
| Median | 9.1% | 13.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 9.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 14.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 4.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 4.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 4.8% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Puget Sound Salish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.18%), South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Welsh (12.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Russia (12.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.7%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109  | Exceptional 12.6%  | 
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110  | Exceptional 12.6%  | 
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111  | Exceptional 12.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 12.6%  | 
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 12.7%  | 
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 12.7%  | 
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115  | Exceptional 12.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116  | Exceptional 12.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117  | Exceptional 12.7%  | 
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118  | Exceptional 12.7%  | 
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119  | Exceptional 12.7%  | 
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120  | Exceptional 12.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121  | Exceptional 12.7%  | 
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122  | Exceptional 12.7%  | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123  | Excellent 12.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124  | Excellent 12.8%  | 
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125  | Excellent 12.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126  | Excellent 12.8%  | 
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127  | Excellent 12.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128  | Excellent 12.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129  | Excellent 12.8%  |