Argentinean vs Turkish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Argentinean
Turkish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Argentineans
Turks
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Turkish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,674,093 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080 and weighted average of 19.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,182,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 2.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Argentinean | Turkish |
Minimum | 3.0% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 54.2% | 67.9% |
Range | 51.2% | 66.2% |
Mean | 18.7% | 20.0% |
Median | 17.8% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 14.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Argentineans and Turks by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (19.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.68%), Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |