Immigrants from Italy vs Turkish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Turkish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Turks
19.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
51st/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Turkish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 318,580,979 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 19.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,182,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 2.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Turkish |
Minimum | 7.7% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
Range | 92.3% | 66.2% |
Mean | 28.7% | 20.0% |
Median | 15.6% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 13.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.9% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.5% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.1% | 14.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.2% | 14.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and Turks by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (19.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |