Argentinean vs Egyptian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Argentinean
Egyptian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Argentineans
Egyptians
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Egyptian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,674,093 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080 and weighted average of 19.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,693,794 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 19.1%, a difference of 0.22%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Argentinean | Egyptian |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 11.6% |
| Maximum | 54.2% | 52.0% |
| Range | 51.2% | 40.4% |
| Mean | 18.7% | 20.8% |
| Median | 17.8% | 18.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.3% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Argentineans and Egyptians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (19.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (19.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Eastern European (19.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 19.2% |