Chickasaw vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ute
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Chickasaw
Ute
80.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,707,163 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 80.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,547 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036 and weighted average of 79.4%, a difference of 1.8%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Ute |
| Minimum | 39.0% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 61.0% | 94.1% |
| Mean | 77.5% | 69.3% |
| Median | 78.4% | 75.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.9% | 65.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.9% | 80.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 15.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 21.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 21.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Ute by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Inupiat (80.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Puerto Rican (80.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Paiute (80.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Yaqui (80.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and Choctaw (80.5%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and Yakama (79.0%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 80.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 80.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 80.7% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |