Chickasaw vs Creek In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Chickasaw
 Creek
 In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Chickasaw
Creek
80.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Creek In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,707,163 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 80.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,449,180 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.469 and weighted average of 80.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Creek | 
| Minimum | 39.0% | 28.7% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 61.0% | 71.3% | 
| Mean | 77.5% | 73.6% | 
| Median | 78.4% | 78.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.9% | 67.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.9% | 81.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 14.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 14.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 14.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Creek by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Inupiat (80.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Puerto Rican (80.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Paiute (80.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Yaqui (80.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and Choctaw (80.5%, a difference of 0.47%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Sioux (80.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 0.44%), Seminole (80.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Dutch West Indian (80.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and Cheyenne (79.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.5% | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.5% | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.4% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.3% | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 80.9% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 80.9% | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 80.7% | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.0% | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 79.7% | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 79.5% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.5% | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.4% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |