Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Median Family Income

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,953,353 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and median family income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of $119,800. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,434,997 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and median family income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.386 and weighted average of $116,165, a difference of 3.1%.

Median Family Income Correlation Summary

Measurement	Bhutanese	Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Minimum	$63,382	$20,761
Maximum	$194,165	$210,139
Range	$130,783	$189,378
Mean	$120,532	$116,278
Median	$114,614	$117,481
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$101,662	$99,688
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$136,845	$133,750
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$35,183	$34,062
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$25,704	$34,098
Standard Deviation (Population)	$25,585	$33,822

Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Median Family Income

In terms of median family income, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Asian ($119,955, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from France ($120,076, a difference of 0.23%), Bolivian ($119,479, a difference of 0.27%), Soviet Union ($119,262, a difference of 0.45%), and Israeli ($118,577, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Chinese ($116,188, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa ($116,286, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Malaysia ($115,880, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Austria ($116,830, a difference of 0.57%), and Immigrants from Russia ($116,942, a difference of 0.67%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Median Family Income
Immigrants \| France	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional $120,076
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional $119,955
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional $119,800
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional $119,479
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional $119,262
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional $118,577
Australians	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional $118,440
Immigrants \| Turkey	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional $118,325
Immigrants \| Asia	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional $118,291
Immigrants \| Lithuania	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional $118,053
Estonians	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional $118,013
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional $117,912
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional $117,818
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional $117,780
Immigrants \| Greece	99.9 /100 \| #45	Exceptional $117,344
Immigrants \| Russia	99.9 /100 \| #46	Exceptional $116,942
Immigrants \| Austria	99.9 /100 \| #47	Exceptional $116,830
Immigrants \| South Africa	99.9 /100 \| #48	Exceptional $116,286
Chinese	99.9 /100 \| #49	Exceptional $116,188
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional $116,165
Immigrants \| Malaysia	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional $115,880