Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Disability Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
DISABILITY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
99th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,521,093 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.122 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,454,618 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 0.010%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Minimum | 4.0% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 21.0% | 37.8% |
Range | 17.0% | 35.2% |
Mean | 11.5% | 13.1% |
Median | 11.2% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.2% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Greece (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Eastern European (11.2%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Greece (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Morocco (11.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Eastern European (11.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 98.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 98.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Ecuadorians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 98.0 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 97.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 97.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bhutanese | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Uruguayans | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 96.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 96.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 96.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 96.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Nicaraguans | 96.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 96.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.3% |