Zimbabwean vs White/Caucasian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
White/Caucasian
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Zimbabweans
Whites/Caucasians
28.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
98.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs White/Caucasian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,374,099 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351 and weighted average of 28.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,410,964 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.751 and weighted average of 33.3%, a difference of 15.9%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 4.3% | 26.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 82.1% |
Range | 95.7% | 56.0% |
Mean | 33.3% | 40.4% |
Median | 27.6% | 37.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 31.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.9% | 45.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 20.1% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.0% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.7% | 11.2% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Danish (28.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (28.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Austria (28.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (28.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Romanian (28.7%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Jordanians | 98.5 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 28.5% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 28.5% |
Albanians | 98.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 28.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 28.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 98.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 28.6% |
Israelis | 98.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 28.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 28.6% |
Zimbabweans | 98.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 28.7% |
Danes | 98.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 28.7% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 98.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 28.7% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 28.7% |
Romanians | 98.0 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 28.7% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 98.0 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 28.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 28.9% |
Sri Lankans | 97.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 28.9% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Celtic (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Hawaiian (33.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Sudan (33.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |