Ottawa vs White/Caucasian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Ottawa
White/Caucasian
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Ottawa
Whites/Caucasians
36.5%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
209th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ottawa vs White/Caucasian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,969,239 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120 and weighted average of 36.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,410,964 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.751 and weighted average of 33.3%, a difference of 9.7%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ottawa | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 17.9% | 26.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 82.1% |
Range | 82.1% | 56.0% |
Mean | 45.9% | 40.4% |
Median | 40.0% | 37.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 33.3% | 31.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.2% | 45.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.9% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.5% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.2% | 11.2% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Ottawa by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Trinidadian and Tobagonian (36.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from El Salvador (36.4%, a difference of 0.12%), American (36.4%, a difference of 0.16%), French American Indian (36.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Nicaraguan (36.6%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Portugal | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 36.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 36.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 36.3% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 36.3% |
Americans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 36.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 36.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 36.5% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 36.5% |
French American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 36.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 36.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 36.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 36.7% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 36.7% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 36.7% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Celtic (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Hawaiian (33.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Sudan (33.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |