Navajo vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Households
COMPARE
Navajo
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Navajo
Immigrants from Hong Kong
66.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,752,458 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192 and weighted average of 66.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,896,995 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155 and weighted average of 66.1%, a difference of 0.35%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Navajo | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 28.6% | 40.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 93.8% |
| Range | 71.4% | 53.1% |
| Mean | 69.7% | 70.3% |
| Median | 69.7% | 70.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.0% | 65.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 75.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Navajo and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Native/Alaskan (66.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (66.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Venezuela (66.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (66.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Colombian (66.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants (66.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Pennsylvania German (66.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Apache | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |