Navajo vs Thai Family Households
COMPARE
Navajo
Thai
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Navajo
Thais
66.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
67.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo vs Thai Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,752,458 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192 and weighted average of 66.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,372,793 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Thais and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 67.2%, a difference of 1.2%.

Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Navajo | Thai |
| Minimum | 28.6% | 48.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 97.0% |
| Range | 71.4% | 48.2% |
| Mean | 69.7% | 72.7% |
| Median | 69.7% | 71.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.0% | 66.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 77.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Navajo and Thais by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Native/Alaskan (66.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (66.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Venezuela (66.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (66.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Colombian (66.3%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Salvadoran (67.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Nepalese (67.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Tohono O'odham (67.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Peruvian (67.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Tsimshian (67.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 67.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Peruvians | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Mexican American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 67.0% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 67.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 66.6% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 66.6% |
| Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Apache | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 66.5% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |