Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Households
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Hong Kong
65.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,880 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.028 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,896,995 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155 and weighted average of 66.1%, a difference of 0.44%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 36.6% | 40.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 93.8% |
| Range | 63.4% | 53.1% |
| Mean | 69.5% | 70.3% |
| Median | 69.4% | 70.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.7% | 65.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.9% | 75.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 10.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.8% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 9.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Fijian (65.9%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants (66.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Pennsylvania German (66.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |