Lithuanian vs Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Chippewa
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Lithuanians
Chippewa
29.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 385,212,926 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506 and weighted average of 29.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,326,129 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 44.3%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 7.7% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 92.3% | 90.0% |
| Mean | 37.3% | 71.0% |
| Median | 31.8% | 75.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.6% | 45.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.0% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 54.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.1% | 27.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.9% | 27.7% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Lebanese (29.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (29.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Australian (29.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (29.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Swedish (29.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.7 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 29.3% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 95.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 29.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 29.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 95.2 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 29.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 94.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 29.5% |
| Australians | 94.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 29.5% |
| Lebanese | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 29.5% |
| Lithuanians | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Swedes | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 29.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.5 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 29.7% |
| Greeks | 93.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 29.7% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 93.4 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 29.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 93.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Paiute (42.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Native/Alaskan (43.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (42.2%, a difference of 1.0%), Tsimshian (42.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Kiowa (43.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 44.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 44.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 45.3% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 45.7% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 46.6% |