Jordanian vs Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Jordanian
Chippewa
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Jordanians
Chippewa
28.5%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,910,775 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.158 and weighted average of 28.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,326,129 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 49.5%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 12.8% | 10.0% |
| Maximum | 56.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 43.6% | 90.0% |
| Mean | 27.2% | 71.0% |
| Median | 25.0% | 75.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.7% | 45.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.7% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 54.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 27.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 27.7% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Sweden (28.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Albanian (28.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Bolivia (28.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Laotian (28.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (28.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Tongans | 98.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.8 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 98.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Palestinians | 98.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 28.4% |
| Bolivians | 98.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 28.5% |
| Laotians | 98.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 28.5% |
| Jordanians | 98.5 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 28.5% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 98.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 28.5% |
| Albanians | 98.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 28.5% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 98.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 28.6% |
| Israelis | 98.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 98.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 28.6% |
| Zimbabweans | 98.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 28.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Paiute (42.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Native/Alaskan (43.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (42.2%, a difference of 1.0%), Tsimshian (42.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Kiowa (43.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 44.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 44.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 45.3% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 45.7% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 46.6% |