Lithuanian vs Crow Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Crow
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Lithuanians
Crow
29.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
40.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Crow Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 385,212,926 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506 and weighted average of 29.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,263,233 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 40.4%, a difference of 36.6%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lithuanian | Crow |
Minimum | 7.7% | 26.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 92.3% | 73.9% |
Mean | 37.3% | 62.6% |
Median | 31.8% | 50.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.6% | 42.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.0% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.4% | 57.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.1% | 29.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.9% | 28.4% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Lebanese (29.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (29.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Australian (29.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (29.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Swedish (29.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.7 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 29.3% |
Immigrants | Syria | 95.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 29.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 29.4% |
Luxembourgers | 95.2 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 29.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 94.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 29.5% |
Australians | 94.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 29.5% |
Lebanese | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 29.5% |
Lithuanians | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 29.6% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 29.6% |
Swedes | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 29.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 29.6% |
Paraguayans | 93.5 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Greeks | 93.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 93.4 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 93.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Demographics Similar to Crow by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yakama (40.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bahamas (40.1%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (40.1%, a difference of 0.68%), Bahamian (40.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and Apache (39.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 39.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 39.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 39.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 39.9% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 40.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 40.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 40.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 40.4% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 40.8% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 41.0% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 41.0% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 41.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 41.3% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 41.5% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 42.2% |