Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Jordan Births to Unmarried Women

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 385,212,926 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506 and weighted average of 29.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,993,428 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.056 and weighted average of 29.0%, a difference of 2.1%.

Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary

Measurement	Lithuanian	Immigrants from Jordan
Minimum	7.7%	2.9%
Maximum	100.0%	60.6%
Range	92.3%	57.7%
Mean	37.3%	26.6%
Median	31.8%	27.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	24.6%	18.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	40.0%	32.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	15.4%	14.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	23.1%	11.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	22.9%	11.1%

Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Immigrants from Jordan by Births to Unmarried Women

In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Lebanese (29.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (29.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Australian (29.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (29.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Denmark (29.4%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Sri Lankan (28.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Taiwanese (29.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from France (29.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (29.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Latvia (29.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Births to Unmarried Women
Sri Lankans	97.5 /100 \| #85	Exceptional 28.9%
Immigrants \| Jordan	97.4 /100 \| #86	Exceptional 29.0%
Taiwanese	97.3 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 29.0%
Immigrants \| France	97.3 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 29.0%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	97.0 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 29.1%
Immigrants \| Latvia	96.8 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 29.1%
Immigrants \| Fiji	96.6 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 29.2%
Arabs	96.5 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 29.2%
Estonians	96.5 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 29.2%
Ukrainians	96.3 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 29.2%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	96.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 29.3%
Norwegians	95.8 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 29.3%
Immigrants \| South Africa	95.7 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 29.3%
Immigrants \| Syria	95.7 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 29.4%
Immigrants \| Denmark	95.3 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 29.4%
Luxembourgers	95.2 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 29.4%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	94.7 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 29.5%
Australians	94.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 29.5%
Lebanese	94.4 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 29.5%
Lithuanians	94.4 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 29.6%
Immigrants \| Nepal	94.3 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 29.6%