Immigrants from Italy vs Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Chippewa
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Chippewa
29.9%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 300,581,400 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754 and weighted average of 29.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,326,129 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 42.6%, a difference of 42.7%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Chippewa |
Minimum | 7.9% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 92.1% | 90.0% |
Mean | 38.5% | 71.0% |
Median | 27.2% | 75.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.8% | 45.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.0% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 54.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.4% | 27.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.3% | 27.7% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Ethiopian (29.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Netherlands (29.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Norway (29.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Croatia (29.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Scandinavian (29.8%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Greeks | 93.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 93.4 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 93.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Basques | 93.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Scandinavians | 92.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 29.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 92.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 29.8% |
Ethiopians | 91.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 29.8% |
Immigrants | Italy | 91.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 29.9% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 91.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 29.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 91.0 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 29.9% |
Argentineans | 90.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 30.0% |
Ugandans | 89.2 /100 | #120 | Excellent 30.1% |
Koreans | 88.9 /100 | #121 | Excellent 30.1% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 30.1% |
Syrians | 88.2 /100 | #123 | Excellent 30.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Paiute (42.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Native/Alaskan (43.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (42.2%, a difference of 1.0%), Tsimshian (42.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Kiowa (43.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 41.0% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 41.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 41.3% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 41.5% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 42.2% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 42.5% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 42.6% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 43.0% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 43.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 44.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 44.4% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 45.3% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 45.7% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 46.6% |