Sioux vs Native/Alaskan Currently Married
COMPARE
Sioux
Native/Alaskan
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Sioux
Natives/Alaskans
41.9%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Native/Alaskan Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,188,920 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.710 and weighted average of 41.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,977,387 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.760 and weighted average of 42.8%, a difference of 2.0%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sioux | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 19.1% |
| Maximum | 84.8% | 53.7% |
| Range | 82.5% | 34.6% |
| Mean | 37.5% | 38.9% |
| Median | 39.4% | 41.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.8% | 32.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.5% | 45.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.7% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.0% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.0% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux and Natives/Alaskans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Immigrants from Zaire (42.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bahamas (41.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (41.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Yemen (42.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Guatemalan (42.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Ghanaian (42.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.9% |