Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Laos Family Households with Children

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,827,817 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630 and weighted average of 29.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,433,217 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Laos and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181 and weighted average of 29.8%, a difference of 0.41%.

Family Households with Children Correlation Summary

Measurement	Guamanian/Chamorro	Immigrants from Laos
Minimum	8.6%	4.8%
Maximum	100.0%	57.7%
Range	91.4%	53.0%
Mean	32.8%	30.1%
Median	29.4%	30.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	25.8%	26.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	34.4%	34.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.7%	8.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	16.3%	8.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	16.1%	8.5%

Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Immigrants from Laos by Family Households with Children

In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Mexican American Indian (29.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Latin America (29.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (29.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from El Salvador (29.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and Alaska Native (29.9%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Laos are Malaysian (29.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from El Salvador (29.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Alaska Native (29.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Salvadoran (29.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Hispanic or Latino (29.9%, a difference of 0.30%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Family Households with Children
Immigrants \| Pakistan	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 30.2%
Afghans	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 30.2%
Bangladeshis	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 30.1%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 30.0%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 30.0%
Hispanics or Latinos	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 29.9%
Salvadorans	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 29.9%
Alaska Natives	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 29.9%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 29.8%
Immigrants \| Laos	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 29.8%
Malaysians	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 29.8%
Mexican American Indians	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 29.7%
Guamanians/Chamorros	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 29.7%
Immigrants \| Latin America	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 29.7%
Sri Lankans	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 29.5%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	100.0 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 29.5%
Samoans	100.0 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 29.5%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 29.5%
Yuman	100.0 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 29.5%
Japanese	100.0 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 29.4%
Immigrants \| Yemen	100.0 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 29.4%