Chinese vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Oceania
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Oceania
50.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
74.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Oceania Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 50.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,387,032 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.425 and weighted average of 46.9%, a difference of 7.3%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 35.3% | 8.8% |
Maximum | 63.0% | 84.0% |
Range | 27.8% | 75.2% |
Mean | 50.6% | 45.7% |
Median | 51.0% | 47.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.3% | 41.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.2% | 51.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 13.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Pennsylvania German (50.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Pakistan (50.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (50.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Swiss (49.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Korea (49.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 51.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 51.8% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 51.6% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 51.1% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 51.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 50.6% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 50.1% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Swedes | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Armenian (46.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Asia (46.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Arab (46.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Hmong (47.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Serbian (47.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Russia | 77.6 /100 | #150 | Good 47.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 76.8 /100 | #151 | Good 47.0% |
Serbians | 76.3 /100 | #152 | Good 47.0% |
Hmong | 76.2 /100 | #153 | Good 47.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 76.1 /100 | #154 | Good 46.9% |
Arabs | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 46.9% |
Armenians | 75.4 /100 | #156 | Good 46.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.8 /100 | #157 | Good 46.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 73.3 /100 | #158 | Good 46.9% |
Osage | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 46.9% |
Iraqis | 71.7 /100 | #160 | Good 46.9% |
Delaware | 71.2 /100 | #161 | Good 46.8% |
Colombians | 71.0 /100 | #162 | Good 46.8% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 70.2 /100 | #163 | Good 46.8% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.0 /100 | #164 | Good 46.8% |