Chickasaw vs Croatian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Croatian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Croatians
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
48.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Croatian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,518,925 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Croatians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.000 and weighted average of 48.5%, a difference of 5.7%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Croatian |
Minimum | 20.0% | 18.1% |
Maximum | 65.4% | 84.8% |
Range | 45.4% | 66.7% |
Mean | 47.8% | 49.2% |
Median | 48.9% | 50.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.2% | 44.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.2% | 54.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 12.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Bulgarian (48.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Luxembourger (48.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Polish (48.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Indonesia (48.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and Czechoslovakian (48.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Whites/Caucasians | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Austrians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Poles | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Croatians | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bulgarians | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 48.5% |
Basques | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Jordanians | 98.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 48.4% |
Romanians | 98.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 48.4% |