Chickasaw vs Taiwanese Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Taiwanese
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Taiwanese
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
23.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Taiwanese Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,715,954 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 0.040%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Taiwanese |
| Minimum | 20.0% | 20.6% |
| Maximum | 65.4% | 74.9% |
| Range | 45.4% | 54.3% |
| Mean | 47.8% | 47.4% |
| Median | 48.9% | 46.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.2% | 38.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.2% | 54.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 15.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 13.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Taiwanese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and Choctaw (46.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Choctaw (46.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (46.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 36.9 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.2% |
| Brazilians | 35.9 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.2% |
| Albanians | 31.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.1% |
| Fijians | 29.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.1% |
| South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
| Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
| Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
| Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
| Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
| Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
| Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |
| Alaska Natives | 13.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 45.6% |
| Aleuts | 12.5 /100 | #204 | Poor 45.6% |