Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Apache Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
 Apache
 Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Apache
43.0%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.2%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Apache Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,724,037 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.467 and weighted average of 43.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,125,444 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Apache and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.488 and weighted average of 43.2%, a difference of 0.60%.
 
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Apache | 
| Minimum | 35.6% | 16.3% | 
| Maximum | 53.8% | 74.2% | 
| Range | 18.2% | 57.9% | 
| Mean | 43.6% | 40.0% | 
| Median | 42.8% | 39.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.4% | 30.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.8% | 46.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 16.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 12.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 12.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Apache by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Ghanaian (42.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Guatemalan (42.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Kiowa (43.2%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from El Salvador (43.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Native/Alaskan (42.8%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Chippewa (43.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (43.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ecuador (43.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Kiowa (43.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (43.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married | 
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #272  | Tragic 43.5%  | 
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #273  | Tragic 43.4%  | 
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274  | Tragic 43.4%  | 
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #275  | Tragic 43.4%  | 
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.1 /100 | #276  | Tragic 43.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #277  | Tragic 43.4%  | 
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #278  | Tragic 43.3%  | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279  | Tragic 43.3%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #280  | Tragic 43.2%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281  | Tragic 43.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282  | Tragic 43.2%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283  | Tragic 43.2%  | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284  | Tragic 43.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285  | Tragic 43.0%  | 
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286  | Tragic 42.9%  | 
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287  | Tragic 42.9%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288  | Tragic 42.8%  | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289  | Tragic 42.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290  | Tragic 42.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291  | Tragic 42.6%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292  | Tragic 42.6%  |