Zimbabwean vs Jordanian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Jordanian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Jordanians
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Jordanian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,401,829 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 0.11%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 0.53% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 6.9% | 6.7% |
| Range | 6.4% | 6.2% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 2.9% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Jordanians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Latin America (2.8%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |