Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Indonesia Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from Indonesia
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from Indonesia
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
94.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Indonesia Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,771,622 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 1.8%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from Indonesia |
Minimum | 0.53% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 6.9% | 12.2% |
Range | 6.4% | 11.0% |
Mean | 3.0% | 3.6% |
Median | 2.9% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 4.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from Indonesia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Latin America (2.8%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Taiwanese (2.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Spain (2.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Burmese (2.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Moroccan (2.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Spain | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Burmese | 94.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |