Immigrants from Belarus vs Jordanian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Jordanian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Jordanians
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Jordanian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,178,365 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.001 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,401,829 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 0.62%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 0.28% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 8.1% | 6.7% |
| Range | 7.9% | 6.2% |
| Mean | 3.2% | 2.9% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Jordanians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Cambodian (2.8%, a difference of 0.17%), U.S. Virgin Islander (2.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Latin America (2.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Yemen (2.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |