Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Jordanian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Jordanian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Jordanians
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Jordanian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,030,824 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,401,829 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 2.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Africa | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 0.83% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 9.9% | 6.7% |
| Range | 9.1% | 6.2% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 2.9% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.68% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Jordanians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa are Immigrants from Spain (2.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Taiwanese (2.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Indonesia (2.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Burmese (2.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and Moroccan (2.8%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Latin America (2.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Burmese | 94.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |