Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Sri Lankan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Sri Lankans
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
118th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,200,821 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,283,716 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Sri Lankan |
| Minimum | 0.53% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 6.9% | 29.8% |
| Range | 6.4% | 28.7% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 4.0% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 0.71% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Sri Lankans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Jordanian (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |