Bahamian vs Jordanian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Bahamian
 Jordanian
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Bahamians
Jordanians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bahamian vs Jordanian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,647,902 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.137 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,401,829 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 0.22%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bahamian | Jordanian | 
| Minimum | 0.49% | 0.50% | 
| Maximum | 8.0% | 6.7% | 
| Range | 7.5% | 6.2% | 
| Mean | 2.8% | 2.9% | 
| Median | 2.7% | 2.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.2% | 2.2% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 3.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Bahamians and Jordanians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Immigrants from Zaire (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Sudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116  | Exceptional 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122  | Excellent 2.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131  | Excellent 2.9%  | 
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132  | Excellent 2.9%  |