Immigrants from Spain vs Jordanian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Spain
Jordanian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Spain
Jordanians
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
94.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Spain vs Jordanian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,646,131 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.699 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,401,829 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 2.8%, a difference of 1.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Spain | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 25.6% | 6.7% |
| Range | 25.3% | 6.2% |
| Mean | 4.9% | 2.9% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 1.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Spain and Jordanians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Spain are Taiwanese (2.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (2.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Indonesia (2.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Burmese (2.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and Moroccan (2.8%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Kenyan (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (2.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants (2.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Latin America (2.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Burmese | 94.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Moroccans | 93.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Hondurans | 93.4 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Guatemalans | 93.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Turks | 93.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cypriots | 92.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 92.7 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 92.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 91.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Cambodians | 91.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 90.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 90.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 90.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 89.9 /100 | #118 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Kenyans | 89.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |