Jordanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Jordanian
Alaskan Athabascan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Jordanians
Alaskan Athabascans
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,387,634 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.077 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,116 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 57.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 0.83% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 3.7% | 16.7% |
| Range | 2.8% | 16.4% |
| Mean | 2.0% | 4.9% |
| Median | 1.9% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.74% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.75% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.74% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Somali (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Laotian (2.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Argentinean (2.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Laotians | 99.3 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Jordanians | 99.2 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Argentineans | 99.1 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 99.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.1 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Armenians | 99.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.93%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |