Tlingit-Haida vs Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Alaskan Athabascan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Alaskan Athabascans
2.9%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,836,708 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,116 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 10.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 7.5% | 16.7% |
| Range | 6.1% | 16.4% |
| Mean | 4.0% | 4.9% |
| Median | 3.7% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.3% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Alaskan Athabascans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Paiute (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Comanche (2.8%, a difference of 0.42%), Hopi (2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), Cherokee (2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and Black/African American (2.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.93%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Cheyenne (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 2.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |