Spanish American vs Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Spanish American
Alaskan Athabascan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Spanish Americans
Alaskan Athabascans
2.9%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spanish American vs Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,153,251 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.946 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,116 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 7.0%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Spanish American | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 0.38% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 83.6% | 16.7% |
Range | 83.3% | 16.4% |
Mean | 5.5% | 4.9% |
Median | 3.3% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.0% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish Americans and Alaskan Athabascans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish Americans are Native/Alaskan (3.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Cherokee (2.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Hopi (2.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Yuman (3.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and Apache (3.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.93%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 2.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 2.9% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 2.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 2.9% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 2.9% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 2.9% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |