Kiowa vs Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Kiowa
 Alaskan Athabascan
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Kiowa
Alaskan Athabascans
3.3%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,085,396 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 3.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,116 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 3.2%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Alaskan Athabascan | 
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.32% | 
| Maximum | 15.0% | 16.7% | 
| Range | 13.4% | 16.4% | 
| Mean | 5.1% | 4.9% | 
| Median | 4.1% | 3.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 2.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 6.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 4.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 3.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 3.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Alaskan Athabascans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and Pima (3.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.93%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |