Immigrants from Ghana vs Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ghana
Alaskan Athabascan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Ghana
Alaskan Athabascans
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
8.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ghana vs Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,859,756 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ghana and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,116 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 40.3%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ghana | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 0.47% | 0.32% |
| Maximum | 6.4% | 16.7% |
| Range | 6.0% | 16.4% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 4.9% |
| Median | 2.1% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.0% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.0% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ghana by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ghana are Bermudan (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Indonesian (2.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (2.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (2.2%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
| Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
| Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.2% |
| Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 6.1 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Barbadians | 5.1 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Portuguese | 4.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 4.6 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 3.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.93%), Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |