Jordanian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Jordanian
Chinese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Jordanians
Chinese
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,412,494 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.384 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,509 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 15.9%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 0.26% |
| Maximum | 8.6% | 17.0% |
| Range | 6.8% | 16.8% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 7.3% |
| Median | 5.3% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Taiwanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Luxembourger (5.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% |