Estonian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Estonian
Chinese
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Estonians
Chinese
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
92.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Estonian vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,516,931 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Estonians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,509 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 9.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Estonian | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.64% | 0.26% |
| Maximum | 24.6% | 17.0% |
| Range | 24.0% | 16.8% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 7.3% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 2.7% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Estonians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Estonians are Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Costa Rican (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Icelander (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Russia (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Germans | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% |