Immigrants from Belize vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belize
 Chinese
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Belize
Chinese
6.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
1.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belize vs Chinese Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,290,767 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belize and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,795,509 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.402 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 1.1%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belize | Chinese | 
| Minimum | 2.4% | 0.26% | 
| Maximum | 14.0% | 17.0% | 
| Range | 11.6% | 16.8% | 
| Mean | 7.4% | 7.3% | 
| Median | 6.7% | 6.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 5.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 8.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 2.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 2.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 2.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belize and Chinese by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belize are Aleut (6.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Irish (6.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Spanish American Indian (6.5%, a difference of 0.19%), English (6.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Bermudan (6.5%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Native Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Hawaiian (6.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Portugal (6.5%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Cuba (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (6.5%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Armenians | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Immigrants | Portugal | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Native Hawaiians | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Chinese | 1.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Hawaiians | 0.9 /100 | #251 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.8 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Scottish | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Belizeans | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Welsh | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Bermudans | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Spanish American Indians | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.5% | 
| Aleuts | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.6% | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.4 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.6% | 
| Irish | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.6% | 
| English | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.6% | 
| Hmong | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 6.6% | 
| Nepalese | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.6% | 
| Bahamians | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.6% |