Tlingit-Haida vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Alaskan Athabascan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Alaskan Athabascans
4.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,852,790 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 9.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 0.61% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 17.5% | 25.0% |
Range | 16.9% | 22.1% |
Mean | 8.3% | 9.0% |
Median | 7.5% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 11.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Alaskan Athabascans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 2.7%), Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 2.9%), Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 4.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Colville (5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Yup'ik (5.8%, a difference of 9.7%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 12.9%), Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 14.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 5.8% |