Swiss vs Polish Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
 Polish
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Swiss
Poles
3.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.4%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Polish Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,835,494 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 3.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,927,295 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 3.4%, a difference of 3.4%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Polish | 
| Minimum | 0.50% | 0.74% | 
| Maximum | 25.0% | 40.6% | 
| Range | 24.5% | 39.8% | 
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.7% | 
| Median | 4.0% | 3.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 3.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.8% | 4.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 6.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 6.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Poles by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Puerto Rican (3.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Fijian (3.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Czech (3.5%, a difference of 0.66%), European (3.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Ute (3.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Hmong (3.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Slavic (3.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Yaqui (3.4%, a difference of 0.49%), Northern European (3.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and Slovene (3.5%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Slavs | 0.2 /100 | #254  | Tragic 3.4%  | 
| Poles | 0.2 /100 | #255  | Tragic 3.4%  | 
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #256  | Tragic 3.4%  | 
| Yaqui | 0.2 /100 | #257  | Tragic 3.4%  | 
| Northern Europeans | 0.2 /100 | #258  | Tragic 3.4%  | 
| Slovenes | 0.1 /100 | #259  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Portuguese | 0.1 /100 | #260  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #261  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Immigrants | North America | 0.1 /100 | #262  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Canada | 0.1 /100 | #263  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Germany | 0.1 /100 | #264  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| British | 0.1 /100 | #265  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Belgians | 0.1 /100 | #266  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #267  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #268  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #269  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Europeans | 0.1 /100 | #270  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Czechs | 0.1 /100 | #271  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #272  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #273  | Tragic 3.5%  | 
| Swiss | 0.0 /100 | #274  | Tragic 3.5%  |