Sudanese vs Chilean Vision Disability
COMPARE
Sudanese
Chilean
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Sudanese
Chileans
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Chilean Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,115,679 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,590,640 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 1.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Chilean |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| Maximum | 5.1% | 4.6% |
| Range | 4.9% | 4.4% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Median | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.64% | 0.79% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.82% | 0.89% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.81% | 0.88% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Chileans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Chile (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Peru (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Venezuela (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Spain (2.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (2.1%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Korean (2.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Armenia (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Denmark (2.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Kenyan (2.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Koreans | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Chileans | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 93.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Peruvians | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 92.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |