Slovene vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Slovene
Chickasaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Slovenes
Chickasaw
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
18.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovene vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,334,117 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.390 and weighted average of 6.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,679,473 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 28.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slovene | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 23.0% | 29.7% |
| Range | 20.4% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 12.1% |
| Median | 6.7% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.0% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Slovenes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Congo (6.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Finnish (6.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (6.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Central America (6.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 24.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 6.2% |
| Italians | 22.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 20.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 6.2% |
| Albanians | 19.7 /100 | #202 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 18.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 6.2% |
| Slovenes | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 6.2% |
| Finns | 17.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 6.2% |
| Alsatians | 15.1 /100 | #207 | Poor 6.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 14.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 13.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 6.3% |
| Samoans | 12.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 6.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 12.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |