Immigrants from Malaysia vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Chickasaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Chickasaw
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,959,775 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,679,473 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 46.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 14.4% | 29.7% |
| Range | 13.3% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 12.1% |
| Median | 5.3% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |