Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Bahamas Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Immigrants from Bahamas
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Immigrants from Bahamas
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
4.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.5%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
11.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Bahamas Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,085,910 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,603,388 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 2.5%, a difference of 1.3%.

Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Immigrants from Bahamas |
Minimum | 0.47% | 0.58% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 7.2% |
Range | 49.5% | 6.6% |
Mean | 6.5% | 2.7% |
Median | 3.6% | 2.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 3.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 0.89% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 1.2% |
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Bahamas by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Immigrants from Moldova (2.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Subsaharan African (2.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Celtic (2.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Honduran (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and White/Caucasian (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from Lebanon (2.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Slovak (2.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Russia (2.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (2.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and Alaskan Athabascan (2.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 12.9 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.5% |
Slovaks | 12.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 12.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 11.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.5% |
Immigrants | Russia | 11.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.5% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.5% |
French | 9.9 /100 | #207 | Tragic 2.5% |
Central Americans | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 2.5% |
Malaysians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 2.5% |
Panamanians | 6.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 2.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 5.1 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.6% |
Samoans | 5.1 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.6% |
Ecuadorians | 4.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 4.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 4.5 /100 | #215 | Tragic 2.6% |
Whites/Caucasians | 4.4 /100 | #216 | Tragic 2.6% |
Celtics | 4.4 /100 | #217 | Tragic 2.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 4.1 /100 | #218 | Tragic 2.6% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |
Hondurans | 3.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.6% |