Scandinavian vs Belgian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Belgian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Scandinavians
Belgians
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
44.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
28.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Belgian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,401,593 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,928,519 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 0.92%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scandinavian | Belgian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 24.6% | 16.4% |
| Range | 22.7% | 15.1% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 6.6% |
| Median | 7.3% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians and Belgians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Austrian (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (6.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from England (6.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Swiss (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Malaysian (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Guatemalan (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Western Europe (6.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (6.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 42.2 /100 | #183 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 41.2 /100 | #184 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 37.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 6.2% |
| Europeans | 36.2 /100 | #186 | Fair 6.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 35.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 6.2% |
| British | 34.3 /100 | #188 | Fair 6.2% |
| Ukrainians | 34.0 /100 | #189 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 33.4 /100 | #190 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 31.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 6.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 31.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 6.2% |
| Guatemalans | 30.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 6.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 6.2% |
| Belgians | 28.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 6.2% |
| Malaysians | 28.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 6.2% |